Chornobyl War Zone: Ukraine Wildlife Under Occupation

The cameras never stopped working. Bolted to trees across the Ukrainian half of the Chornobyl exclusion zone, set there in 2021 to count an elusive population of lynx, they kept doing the one thing they were built to: wait, and watch, and trip their shutters whenever something warm moved past. Then, on the morning of 24 February 2022, Russian armour rolled across the border and into the zone. The lynx survey became something nobody had designed it to be.

For 36 days the exclusion zone was occupied ground, a staging post for the largest military operation in Europe since 1945. And the whole time, in the woods around the soldiers, the cameras kept counting.

An experiment nobody would ever choose to run

What Svitlana Kudrenko and her colleagues have published in Science is a study assembled from accident. You can’t ethically design a trial that exposes a wild ecosystem to a shooting war; you can only be unlucky enough to already have instruments in the ground when one arrives.

The Chornobyl zone, 2,600 square kilometres emptied of people after the 1986 reactor disaster, had spent three and a half decades rewilding itself, filling up with red deer, moose, wild boar, foxes and the lynx the survey was meant to track. By coincidence, that survey gave researchers a rare before-and-after ledger of how mammals behave when humans stop being a nuisance and start being a lethal threat.

The comparison they could make was unusually clean. The same weeks, the same forest, one year apart. In 2021, peacetime. In 2022, occupation.

The data came out of the field the hard way. After Russian forces withdrew on 1 April, the team went back in to retrieve memory cards from 31 camera stations. And they could only do it because soldiers of the Ukrainian Armed Forces cleared and secured the ground first. Mines, unexploded ordnance, the general detritus of a retreating army: this isn’t a place you wander into to check a wildlife camera. Meteorologists, remarkably, had stayed at their posts inside the zone throughout the occupation, logging weather data while the fighting went on around them.

Kudrenko, who is affiliated with the Frankfurt Zoological Society and universities in Freiburg and south-eastern Norway, said that one of her priorities was “increasing recognition for local researchers in less developed countries”. It’s a pointed thing to say from inside a war zone, where the people doing the dangerous fieldwork are rarely the ones whose names travel.

The animals changed their hours

And what the cameras showed, once the team modelled roughly 1,900 daily detections against the rhythm of the fighting, was a forest rearranging its timetable. The headline result runs against the grain of almost everything ecologists expected. Animals under pressure from humans usually go nocturnal, slipping their activity into the cover of darkness to dodge the daylight world of people. Red deer and red fox in occupied Chornobyl did the opposite. Their nighttime detections fell sharply compared with the same stretch of 2021, which suggests they had moved their activity into the daytime instead. Quite why isn’t settled, though the authors point to an obvious candidate: the dark was no longer safe. Nights of artillery and air raids may have turned the small hours into the most dangerous time to be abroad, so the deer and the foxes moved their business to the light.

Not every species read the war the same way. Roe deer, a notably jumpy animal, simply showed up less and less as the fighting intensified, in step with an “armed-conflict intensity index” the team built from interviews with people on the ground, scored from zero on a quiet day up to ten when the shelling and air raids came. Brown hares appeared more often on days when satellites picked up thermal anomalies, the heat signatures of fires lit by explosions and burning forest. Foxes and lynx, meanwhile, drifted closer to the abandoned buildings and outposts where people had once lived, perhaps treating them as the safest patches left in a landscape gone strange.

The researchers frame all this as a shift in what ecologists call the landscape of fear, the invisible map of risk that every prey animal carries in its head. Before 2022, the worst thing in the Chornobyl woods was the occasional human and the predators that had always been there. Occupation rewrote the map overnight, layering lethal threats on top of nonlethal ones, and the animals redrew their routines accordingly.

It’d be easy to oversell a study like this, and the authors don’t. The two years didn’t use an identical set of camera stations, the samples were small, and a forest as vast and long-abandoned as Chornobyl may have cushioned its wildlife in ways a smaller, more fragmented reserve never could. A shooting war is a messy lab. The team treats its own numbers with care, which is the right instinct.

Still, the wider point is hard to dodge. Wars are studied almost entirely through their human cost, and the ecological wreckage tends to be inferred later from a distance, once the guns have gone quiet and someone counts the damage. Here the damage was being recorded as it happened, by machines too dumb to be afraid. It shows that the tools of ordinary conservation, the humble camera trap left ticking on a tree, can document a war’s reach into the living world in close to real time.

There’s something to watch in what comes next. The Chornobyl zone remains militarised, and if the disturbance becomes permanent rather than a 36-day spasm, the deer and foxes that merely shifted their hours may end up shifting their ranges, their numbers, the whole shape of the community. The cameras, one assumes, will keep watching. They tend to.

Frequently Asked Questions